Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Requirement Provide the FIRAC - Facts, Issues, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion? In December 2001, Louis and Deborah Pearson signed a contract related to the purchase and

In December 2001, Louis and Deborah Pearson signed a contract related to the purchase and installation of an Pearson v. Fullingim, Not Reported in S.W.3d (2006) DISCUSSION In three issues, Mr. Pearson argues that the Pearson v. Fullingim, Not Reported in S.W.3d (2006) (3) a meeting of the minds, (4) each party's consent to Pearson v. Fullingim, Not Reported in S.W.3d (2006) offer and acceptance with consent to the terms by the Pearson v. Fullingim, Not Reported in S.W.3d (2006) be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust. See id. We Requirement


Provide the FIRAC - Facts, Issues, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion?

In December 2001, Louis and Deborah Pearson signed a contract related to the purchase and installation of an HVAC system in their home by Awesome Air. The Pearsons later decided not to use Awesome Air's services or products. On August 8, 2002, Awesome Air filed suit against the Pearsons for breach of contract. The Pearsons were each served with citation and answered separately, asserting that the signed document was an estimate rather than a contract, and that they had been told they only needed to sign it for insurance purposes. The handwritten answers were file-stamped September 20 and October 11, respectively. Awesome Air filed a notice of hearing on October 30, setting trial for December 19. After the Pearsons failed to appear at trial, the trial court heard evidence and signed a default judgment in favor of Awesome Air for $3,101.39 in damages, $310.14 in pre-judgment interest, $245 in costs of court, $2,330 in attorney fees, and additional attorney's fees in the event of an appeal. The Pearsons filed a motion for new trial on February 21, 2003, alleging that they did not receive notice of the trial setting and were unaware that the trial had occurred or that a judgment had been signed until a writ of execution was attempted at Mrs. Pearson's place of business on February 5.3 A hearing on the motion for new trial was held on March 24.4 The trial court denied Mr. Pearson's motion, but granted Mrs. Pearson's. Awesome Air subsequently dismissed its suit against Mrs. Pearson. This appeal followed.

Step by Step Solution

3.51 Rating (161 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

FIRAC is a common framework used in legal analysis and legal writing It stands for Facts Issues Rule ... blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Auditing a risk based approach to conducting a quality audit

Authors: Karla Johnstone, Audrey Gramling, Larry Rittenberg

9th edition

9781133939160, 1133939155, 1133939163, 978-1133939153

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

2. Use different groups for different subjects.

Answered: 1 week ago