Review briefly Sony v. Universal City Studios (U.S., 1984). https:///scholar.google, com/scholar case? case =5876335373788447272&q=SONY+v+ Universal + City +S tudios\&hl=en\&as sdt 1000003 Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision? Why do you believe this is regarded as such an important precedent? (See also paper by Jessica Litman: http://www- personal.umich.edw\%7Eidchlitman/papers/storvofsonv.pdf In the Sonyv Universal case, if a device is sold for a legitimate purpose and has a substantial noninfringing use, its manufacturer will not be liable under copyright law for potential infringement by its users Review briefly Sega v. Accolade (9th Cir. 1992), as described by Samuelson. Why d you think this is regarded as such an important precedent? Should Perfect 10 be able to prevent Google's search engines from facilitating access to images that infringe Perfect 10's copyright? (See Perfect 10 v. Amazon com) wscholarr Did you agree with the Supreme Court's subsequent ruling against Grokster, Ltd in its dispute with MGM? http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-480.ZS.html How was Grokster different from the Napster case, and how was it the same