Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Review the audit risk model assessment and documentation . How should this assessment be altered to correctly reflect the appropriate risk assessment of the firm?

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

  1. Review the audit risk model assessment and documentation . How should this assessment be altered to correctly reflect the appropriate risk assessment of the firm? How might the documentation of audit risk be improved?
Alpine Cupcakes, Inc. Audit Risk Assessment Memo Audit Year December 31, 20X2 Garcia and Foster, CPAS Performed by: SDM Date: 9/15/20X2 Reviewed by: TKJ Date: 2/14/20X3 Materiality Methodology: Planning materiality (PM) letermined as follows: (1) For public clients, we base materiality on 6% of prior year's net income unless the client is at a loss or close to break even, in which case we base materiality on 1% of total assets. (2) For private clients, we base materiality on 1% of prior year's equity. Tolerable misstatement (TM) is set at 50% of PM. Summary of audit differences (SAD) threshold is set at 5% of PM. We will place any identified misstatements greater than our SAD threshold onto the SAD listing. During our evaluations of overall misstatements, we will compare the total of misstatements on the SAD listing to our PM threshold. Application of Methodology to Alpine Audit for 20x2: 20x1 Total Equity for Alpine Cupcakes, Inc.: $741,409 (B.1.1) Materiality thresholds for the 20x2 audit: PM = 0.01 * $741,409= $7,414 $7,400 TM = 0.50 x $7,400 = $3,700 SAD = 0.05 * $7,400 = $370 Application of IR, CR, and DR for 20x2 Alpine Audit: Our preliminary risk assessment levels are set as follows: = Low Audit Risk Inherent risk Control risk Detection risk High Moderate High = Alpine Cupcakes, Inc. Audit Risk Assessment Memo Audit Year December 31, 20X2 Garcia and Foster, CPAS Performed by: SDM Date: 9/15/20X2 Reviewed by: TKJ Date: 2/14/20X3 Materiality Methodology: Planning materiality (PM) letermined as follows: (1) For public clients, we base materiality on 6% of prior year's net income unless the client is at a loss or close to break even, in which case we base materiality on 1% of total assets. (2) For private clients, we base materiality on 1% of prior year's equity. Tolerable misstatement (TM) is set at 50% of PM. Summary of audit differences (SAD) threshold is set at 5% of PM. We will place any identified misstatements greater than our SAD threshold onto the SAD listing. During our evaluations of overall misstatements, we will compare the total of misstatements on the SAD listing to our PM threshold. Application of Methodology to Alpine Audit for 20x2: 20x1 Total Equity for Alpine Cupcakes, Inc.: $741,409 (B.1.1) Materiality thresholds for the 20x2 audit: PM = 0.01 * $741,409= $7,414 $7,400 TM = 0.50 x $7,400 = $3,700 SAD = 0.05 * $7,400 = $370 Application of IR, CR, and DR for 20x2 Alpine Audit: Our preliminary risk assessment levels are set as follows: = Low Audit Risk Inherent risk Control risk Detection risk High Moderate High =

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Handbook Of Energy Audits

Authors: Albert Thumann, Terry Niehus, William J. Younger

7th Edition

1420067915, 978-1420067910

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions