rewrite: In this case, Bennett's contract claim centers on SCC's failure to deliver a home suitable for its intended purpose and constructed with quality workmanship. Despite any consequential damages described as "damage to realty," Bennett's claims rest on contractual obligations. According to 9-24 of the Franklin Civil Code, claims arising from construction contracts must be filed within six years of substantial completion, regardless of when the defects were discovered (Popper v. Naybors). Since the house was substantially completed in July 1997, and it is now well into 2004, the six-year statute of limitations on contractual claims has expired. While there are arguments to potentially toll the statute of limitations, they are unlikely to succeed based on existing case law