Rob and his girlfriend, Sarah won tickets to the next game of their city's professional basketball team. The tickets they won were front row seats. During the course of the game, one of the home team's players dove for the ball and ended up striking and injuring Rob.

If Rob were to sue the player and the team, the team will likely use the issue of Rob's assumption of the risk, Rob's contributory negligence, Rob's last clear chance, and/or Rob's comparative fault as a defense.

Which issue would be more likely to deliver a result favorable to the team? Why? Please explain your answer in detail.

NOTE: Your response, which is due by 5pm, Sunday, February 27, should be at least three paragraphs. Students are also required to post a response to a fellow classmate's answer. Each response should be at least two paragraphs.