Robert Parr made an agreement with Safari Motel that he would vacate the hotel room he was occupying in $30$ days. If he did, then he would not owe $$3,000$ in rent to Safari Motel. The contract also stated that $$time is of the essence.$$ Robert vacated in $35$ days. Safari Motel brings an action against Mr$.$ Parr for $$3,000.$ Which of the following is the most probable result by the court?

Group of answer choices

Safari Motel will get a monetary judgment for $$3,000$

Safari Motel will only ben entitled for a judgment for possession even though possession is not at issue since Robert vacated.

Robert Parr will owe nothing since he vacated in $35$ days.

Safari Motel will only be entitled to the fair market value of $5$ days.