Rosss Lipstick Companys long-term debt agreements make certain demands on the business. For example, Ross may not purchase treasury stock in excess of the balance of retained earnings. Also, long-term debt may not exceed stockholders equity, and the current ratio may not fall below 1.50. If Ross fails to meet any of these requirements, the companys lenders have the authority to take over management of the company. Changes in consumer demand have made it hard for Ross to attract customers Current liabilities have mounted faster than current assets, causing the current ratio to fall to 1.47. Before releasing financial statements, Rosss management is scrambling to improve the current ratio. The controller points out that an investment can be classified as either long-term or short-term, depending on managements intention. By deciding to convert an investment to cash within one year, Ross can classify the investment as short-term-a current asset. On the controllers recommendation, Rosss board of directors votes to reclassify long-term investments as short-term.

Shortly after the financial statements are released, sales improve; so, too, does the current ratio. As a result, Ross's management decides not to sell the investments it had reclassified as short-term. Accordingly, the company reclassifies the investments as long-term. Has management behaved unethically?