s. The consignee of the cargo noticed the damage as soon as the container had been received at the premises. The consignee gave the carrier a notice of damage in writing five days after receipt of the cargo. The carrier rejected the claim. Defend the carrier's rejection of this claim. Support your answer with reasons from the B/L terms and conditions 6. After some research the shipper found out that the container had not been loaded on an APL vessel, but on a vessel operated by MSC. The shipper thought he could bring this as extra evidence to support his claim. The carrier's position is that he can load the container on any vessel without notifying the shipper