Sam is a new Nurse Practitioner (NP) in an independent physician-owned primary care office located in a small community. He loves working with the patients and gets along very well with his coworkers. Normally, Sam will see a patient on his own, or with a female nurse, if the patient is female. However, Sam recently noticed that his time with a patient was coded and billed to Medicare as one of the physician's time. He recalled the legal course in nursing school about Medicare and knew that NP's time is reimbursed at 80% of the actual charge or at 85% of the physician's fee schedule amount, whichever is the lesser. He also remembered that the physician he was billed under was not in the office that day. Being concerned, he reviewed some additional records and discovered almost all of his time was coded and billed to Medicare as one of the physician's time. When he questioned the billing clerk about the coding, her reply was "the Physician Assistant's and NP's time are always coded that way". Sam believes this maybe fraud and does not know what to do. He needs the job, as there are not many opportunities to do work of this type in the community. Plus, making this issue public could damage his reputation - making it difficult to find work in the medical field at all, it could also impact his co-workers, and ultimately reduce patients' access to primary health care. Sam wants to know what to do!

1. In your opinion, has a Medicare billing violation occurred? Please include an analysis of the legal concepts of "up-coding" and "incident to billing" to explain why you think there was a violation or why you think there was no violation. In your analysis, be sure to discuss these concepts based on the facts and law.