Sam Student was a student at Big University. Sam attended Big University from 1995 until 1999. During that time he was a difficult student. He was openly critical of Big University, his professors, and the other students. Sam began his academic career majoring in Biology, but then shifted his major to history, then to Creative Writing, and then to Mathematics. In his last year, he did not attend many classes, and rejected the typical academic regimen of term papers and examinations. Ultimately, Sam failed a number of courses and did not have enough credits to graduate from Big University. Sam refused to pay Big University its remaining tuition, and so Big University sued Sam in court. Sam defended the case on the theory of misrepresentation - basically arguing that Big University had failed to impart "wisdom" and "knowledge" on Sam as promised in its brochures, its mottos, and its catalogs. If you were the judge in this case, what would you decide? For whom would you rule?