Sanders agreed in writing to write, direct, and produce a

motion picture on the subject of lithography $($a method for

printing using stone or metal$)$ for the Tamarind Lithography

Workshop. After the completion of this film, Four Stones for

Kanemitsu, litigation arose concerning the parties' rights and

obligations under their agreement. Tamarind and Sanders

resolved this dispute by a written settlement agreement that

provided for Tamarind to give Sanders a screen credit stat$-$

ing, "A Film by Terry Sanders." Tamarind did not comply with

this agreement and failed to include the agreed$-$upon screen

credit for Sanders. Sanders sued Tamarind seeking damages for

breach of the settlement agreement and specific performance to

compel Tamarind's compliance with its obligation to provide

the screen credit.

a$.$ What arguments would support the claim of Sanders for

specific performance in addition to damages?

b$.$ What arguments would support Tamarind's claim that

Sanders was not entitled to specific performance in addition

to damages?

c$.$ Which side's arguments are most convincing? Explain.