Sarah is off to a lengthy shopping expedition to Southpark, which is a multi-stoly retail centre. She parks her car in an underground car park operated by Carefreeparking Pty Ltd. At the entrance to the car park is a large sign that reads: 1Number plate recognition operates in this car park. Parking subject to conditions - see inside. Pay at pay station inside Shopping Centre before leaving. No liability accepted". Sarah parks her car and does not think to look for, nor did she see, the parking conditions. She returns a few hours later and finds that her car is missing. Later that day, it was found fifty kilometres awa t. abandoned and destroyed by fire. The car was a total loss, as were its contents. Neither the car, nor its contents, were insured. The car had a pre-loss market value of $10,000 and the contents $1,500. On seeking to recover her loss from Carefreeparking Pty Ltd, Sarah was informed by the Company's solicitors that parking in the car park was subject to conditions that were prominently displayed at the entrance to the Southpark Shopping Centre from the car park. One of those conditions stated: 1'Carefreeparking Pty Ltd does not accept any responsibility for the loss or damage to any vehicle or its contents or for any injury to any person howsoever such loss damage or injury may arise or be caused". Required Advise Sarah whether she can recover her losses from Carefreeparking Pty Ltd, making reference to relevant cases and legal principles