Sarah lost her bag which The issue is whether Liza can claim the RM 500 reward from Sarah. contained a digital camera. The law applicable are Section 2(a) of the Contracts Act (CA) which explains that a proposal is when someone signifies his willingness to enter into a She advertised in a contract, Section 3 CA which states proposal must be communicated and newspaper Utusan Kini Section 4(1) CA which provides a proposal is communicated when it reaches the a person to whom it is made. The case that can be referred to is the case of R v. reward of RM 500 to Clarke. In this case, Clarke as accomplice of a murder was brought to the court for interrogation. To save his skin, Clarke gave information leading to the anyone who found and arrest of X and Y, the ones that the police were looking for. Because he returned the camera to cooperated with the police, he was released. However, Clarke found out that the police had put up an advertisement stating they will give a reward to her. Loza found the bag at anyone who can supply them with information which leads to the arrest of X and Y. Clarke claimed the reward from the police but it was denied. The court a car park and returned it held that since Clarke did not know about the reward when he gave information to her. Liza only knew of claim failed. to the police, there was no communication of the proposal to him and thus his the reward promised the To apply the law to the question, the advertisement in Utusan Kini made by next day after reading the Sarah offering a reward of RM 500 to anyone who found and returned the camera to her is a proposal as defined by Section 2(a) CA. 1 However, Liza did advertisement in Utusan not know about the reward when she returned the camera to Sarah so this is not in line with Section 3 CA. 2 Liza only knew about the reward the next day, Kini. Advise Liza whether which means the proposal was not communicated to her as per Section 4(1) CA. she can claim the RM 500 3 With reference to the case of R v. Clarke, 4 Liza would fail if she claim the reward from Sarah because she did not know about the reward when she reward from Sarah. returned the bag to her In conclusion, Liza cannot claim the RM 500 reward from Sarah.Sarah lost her bag which The issue is whether (Only one sentence is enough) contained a digital camera. She advertised in a newspaper The law applicable are....mimimimi (Include the Utusan Kini a reward of RM 500 Sections and Cases here. Please prioritize the Sections. State to anyone who found and what is important in the Sections. For cases, please narrate the facts of case together with the court held) returned the camera to her. Loza found the bag at a car To apply the law to the question,..... park and returned it to her. Liza Sections and cases to the facts of your question. Do not copy (Apply your only knew of the reward back what is in the Sections and Cases, just apply. It is like giving advice) promised the next day after reading the advertisement in In conclusion, (State your conclusion by Utusan Kini, Advise Liza answering your issue. Limit to one sentence only) whether she can claim the RM 500 reward from Sarah