Question
Scenario: The researchers designed a study using a convenience sample of 40 participants who have entered treatment for smoking dependence. The participants were randomly assigned
Scenario:
The researchers designed a study using a
convenience sample of 40 participants who have
entered treatment for smoking dependence. The
participants were randomly assigned to one of two
treatment groups, the standard treatment program or
the standard treatment program with Mindfulness
Therapy. Participants will receive treatment for 16
weeks and then complete a Youth Specific version of
the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS).
The treatment groups are considered equivalent at
the beginning of the study based on random
assignment to groups. The null hypothesis states
there will be no difference in scores on the NDSS
between those who receive the standard treatment
program and those who receive the standard
treatment program with Mindfulness Therapy. The
researcher used an independent samples t-test to
analyze the data.
The scores on the Youth-Specific NDSS for the two groups are:
Independent Samples T-Test Results: The results are t(38) = 4.9607, p = .000.
Standard Treatment Means = 13.25 (Standard Deviation = 3.51)
Standard Treatment AND Mindfulness Means= 8.1 (Standard Deviation = 3.04)
QUESTIONS:
Does the study design accurately test the null hypothesis?
Is the correct statistical test used to analyze the data? Why? Why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started