Schedule and Budget
Steering Committee Feedback Checklist

1. AnswerALL questions
   1. Answers with “Yes/No” do not need an explanation
   2. Answers with “Unsure” need an explanation
   3. Provide a minimum of 2 feedback items for the last question in each section and include:
      • WHAT to improveor WHAT was done wellAND
      • WHY the feedback is being provided
      • RECOMMENDATIONS for the project team to consider

1. Post.
   1. Once complete, start new thread andcopy-pasteyour feedback (content below the line) and post on the discussion board for the team you are providing a peer review before the due date and time.
   2. Do not attach file.

1. Restrictions& Recommendations
   1. You cannot repeat/reuse feedback from previous sections in the overall section. The overall section must have standalone and unique feedback
   2. Your feedback is beproject specific and not generalized. For example, if there is a grammar error, be specific to where it is in the document.
   3. Spelling, grammar, and professionalism feedback is to be listed in the overall section. The previous sections are to focus on content of the document.

EXAMPLE OF EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK

Feedback Point	WHAT is the feedback?	WHY are you giving this feedback?	Recommendations for improvement
#1	Task 2.2 and Task 2.3 have no dependencies	This dependency will greatly impact your schedule – you cannot start construction without a permit. If there is a delay in the permit, then your start date will also be impacted.	Add an FS relationship between the 2 tasks
#2	There are no costs listed with Task 3.7	This task has 40 hours’ worth of work and lots of materials are required to accomplish; that has a significant impact to your budget.	Include labour and cost of materials for task 3.7 (and perhaps equipment if that is part of the task)
#3	Task 5.2 is a summary task and has a name associated to it	Remove name, summary tasks should not have a resource assigned to it (standard industry practice)	Remove “Project Manager” from 5.2