Schmerber v$.$ California: The defendant was convicted of drunk driving. He was arrested at a hospital while receiving treatment for injuries suffered in an accident caused by his drunk driving. The police asked a physician to draw his blood for chemical analysis over the defendants objection. The defendant argued that forcing him to provide incriminating evidence $($the blood$)$ violated his Fifth Amendment right. The Court held that the police action $\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$ the Fifth Amendment protection against self$-$incrimination. violated did not violate