Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

Schmidt dies before Barry's acceptance, and at the time he accepts, Barry is unawar Schmidt's death. This offer is automatically terminated and is no longer

image text in transcribed
Schmidt dies before Barry's acceptance, and at the time he accepts, Barry is unawar Schmidt's death. This offer is automatically terminated and is no longer to uphold this contra (b) The night before Barry accepts, fire destroys the equipment. The night before Barry accepts, fire destroys the equipment. Before Barry accepts the offer, the equipment is destroyed, which automatically terminates th contract even though a notice of destruction is not required. (c) Barry pays $100 for a thirty-day option to purchase the equipment. During this period, Schmid dies, and later Barry accepts the offer, knowing of Schmidt's death. During this period, Schmidt dies, and later Barry accepts the offer, knowing of Schmidt's death even though the offeree's power of acceptance from Schmidt automatically terminates when the offeror or offeree dies or is illegally incapacitated. (d) Barry pays $100 for a thirty-day option to purchase the equipment. During this period, Barry dies, and Barry's estate accepts Schmidt's offer within the stipulated time period. Even though Barry's estate accepts Schmid's offer there was a agreement between Barry and Schmidt not Barry's estate. | 9. OnThursday, Dennis mailed a letter to Tanya's office offering to sell his car to her for $3,000. On Saturday, having changed his mind, Dennis sent a fax to Tanya's office revoking his offer. Tanya did not go to her office over the weekend and thus did not learn about the revocation until Monday morning, just a few minutes after she had mailed a letter of acceptance to Dennis. When Tanya demanded that Dennis sell his car to her as promised, Dennis claimed that no contract existed because he had revoked his offer prior to Tanya's acceptance. Is Dennis correct? Fully discuss and explain. 10. While gambling at Prairie Meadows Casino, Troy Blackford became angry and smashed a slot machine. He was banned from the premises. Despite the ban, he later gambled at the casino and won $9,387. When he tried to collect his winnings, the casino refused to pay. Blackford filed a suit for breach of contract, arguing that he and the casino had a contract because he accepted its offer to gamble. Did the casino and Blackford have a contract? Fully discuss. es) Focus MacBook Pro % A &

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Financial Accounting and Reporting a Global Perspective

Authors: Michel Lebas, Herve Stolowy, Yuan Ding

4th edition

978-1408076866

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Solve Prob. 27.4 with the finite-difference approach using x = 2.

Answered: 1 week ago