schoolsuspension * delinquency_cat delinquency level of respondent rootab delinquency cat delinquency level of respondent Total Ino delinquency 2 some delinuman Court 89 48 137 1 Yes % within delinquency cal delinquency level of 19.5% 43.2% 24.1 respondent choobsuspension Count 368 63 431 % within delinquency cal 2 No delinquency level of 80.5% 56.8% 75.9 respondent Count 457 568 Total % within delinquency cal delinquency level of 100.0% 100.0% 100 renandat Chi-Square Tot dr Asan Sin (2aideli Exact Six (2led) Exact Si Pen Chi-Square 27.567- I .000 Continuity Correction 26.284 .000 Likelihood Ratio 25.110 .000 Fisher's Exact T .000 000 incar-by-Linear Asociation 27.518 1 .000 of Valid Ca 568 0 cells (0.0%) have expected countless than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.77. Computal only for 2x2 ble Xrectional Meran Symmetric Vala Awme. Sad. Emor .000 .000 .000 Lambda Nominal by Nominal schoolsuspension Dependent .000 delinquency cat delinquency level of respondent Dependent 000 .000 Goodman and Kruskaltau schoolsuspension Dependent .049 delinquency cat delinquency 040 level of respondent Dependent 020 020 Not aouming the null hypothesis. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero. Based on chi-square approximation Symmetric Menur Nominal by Nominal Dedinal by Ordinal of Valid Cas Arnus, S .000 Phi -220 Cramer's V 220 .000 -518 082 4.501 000 568