Section 1. (9 marks) The goal of this study is to investigate the differences of Performance of worker across categories of Effort and Progress. For the study, there is one continuous dependent variable (Performance), and two categorical independent variables, Effort (low/high) and Progress (low/high). We applied two models of two-way ANOVA to the data as follows. Two-Way ANOVA # 1 Two-Way ANOVA # 2 The SAS System The ARKOMA Procedure The ANOVA Procedure Claws Level Information Claw Level Information Claw Levels Values Class Lewis Values Effort 2 High Low PHart 2 HighLow Progress 2 High Low Progress 2 High Low Number of Observations Read 23 Number of Obex-rations Read |32 Number of Observations Used 27 Number of Obaovations Used 22 The SA5 System The SAS System The ANOVA Procedure The ANDVA Procedure pendent Variable: Performance Dependent Variable: Performance Source OF Sum of Squares Muan Square F Value Pr - F Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Modul 0.00803049 20328 7832 108240 20001 Model 2 4. 41418441 37.47 004 STOP 0.06232061 0.00180878 Error Comecled Total 0. 1209028 Coneoted Total 31 3 1209 0530 R-Square Coelf Var Root MBE Perfumance Mean R-Square Craft Var Rose MISE Performance Mean 0.881431 183004 0.0-43523 0.831044 07208:2 29. 17977 0242072 0.891044 OF Anow 98 Mean Square F Value Pr = F Source OF Angus $5 Mean Square F Value Pr F Ellon 14 40123028 4.40228008 2303.70 <.0001 effort progress elfon by looking at results from two-way anova is the main effect of significant argue. mark interaction term which model best: or you need to give two formal arguments. marks in general what advantage using>