Security through obscurity...this expression suggests that proprietary software is more secure because it is closed. If hackers cannot see the code, then it will be more difficult for them to create exploits...or so the thinking goes.

Unfortunately for Windows users, this thought is simply not true--as evidenced by the never-ending patches (Links to an external site.) coming out. In fact, one of Linux's many advantages over Windows (Links to an external site.) is that it is much more secure. For small businesses and organizations without a dedicated security experts, more security is critical.

So now let's debate! For this assignment, we will have a class discussion where you and your peers will take a side and tell the class why you believe one operating system is more secure than the other. Before any great debate, it is important to research and be able to justify your position.

Directions: In a one- to two-paged paper, describe why you believe that Linux is more secure than Windows operating systems or why Windows is more secure than Linux operating systems. In your submission, make sure to:

• Include three to five key points of why one operating system is more secure than the other.
• Defend your position using information from credible sources (i.e., newspapers, articles, magazines, databases). Your key points should be adequately supported by credible sources.
• Cite your sources in APA format.

During class, we will have a debate in which you use the information from your research to help support your position. Some people will agree with you; others might disagree with your viewpoint. Think of your paper as your background research needed to support yourself during our in-class debate. Your participation grade for the day will be affected by your participation in the in-class debate.

Prepare your paper in a Microsoft Word document named Lastname_U4_Debate.docx and upload it as your submission for this assignment.

2019 ECPI

Rubric

Unit 4 Debate Grading Rubric

Unit 4 Debate Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Points 50.0 pts Excels in responding to assignment. Demonstrates sophistication of thought and sources are used to support stance. 45.0 pts A solid paper, responding appropriately to assignment. Clearly has a stance but may have minor lapses in key points. 40.0 pts Adequate but weaker and less effective, possibly responding less well to assignment. Perhaps not all key points are supported with sources. 35.0 pts Does not have a clear stance, is unsupported, or does not respond appropriately to the assignment. 0.0 pts No Marks 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style 10.0 pts Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. 9.0 pts Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. 8.0 pts Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. 7.0 pts Does not cite sources. 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredible Sources 20.0 pts Sources used are authoritative, current, and credible. All web sites utilized are authoritative. 18.0 pts Most sources used are authoritative, current, and credible. All web sites utilized are authoritative. 16.0 pts Some sources used have issues with credibility or being current. 14.0 pts Many issues with sources. Issues may range from credibility to relevance. 0.0 pts No Marks 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Mechanics 20.0 pts No spelling and/or grammar mistakes. 18.0 pts Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes. 16.0 pts Noticeable spelling and/or grammar mistakes. 14.0 pts Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. 0.0 pts No Marks 20.0 pts Total Points: 100.0