Select the best answer choice. Olivia Owner has a makeup company, Bipsiez. On July 8, she sent a written request to a Makeup Anonymous Company, a makeup supplier, asking for the price of a particular makeup brush set that was on sale for the holidays. Makeup Anonymous Company sent a written reply with a catalog listing the prices and description of all of their available brush sets. The letter stated that the terms of sale were cash within 45 days of delivery. On July 16, by return letter, Olivia Owner ordered the 500 brush sets, enclosing a check for $10,500, the amount for 500 units at the listed price of $21. Immediately on receipt of the order and check, Makeup Anonymous Company informed Olivia Owner that there had been a pricing mistake in the catalog, which should have quoted the price as $23 a unit, which would total $11,500 for that amount of brush sets. Olivia Owner refused to pay the additional $500. In a suit for damages, will Makeup Anonymous Company prevail over Olivia Owner? O Yes, because the first communication stated the terms calling for cash within 45 days of delivery. No, because Olivia's July 16 letter was a proper acceptance of Makeup Anonymous Company's offer. Yes, because Makeup Anonymous Company's first communication did not constitute an offer. O Yes, because there was a bilateral mistake as to price