she was unhappy with her will and directed her lawyer to draft a new will which would divide her estate more equally between her two children. Greenacre was worth approximately 85 percent ofher estate. The lawyer drafted the new will promptly and asked Tess to visit his office to review it. Since Tess was no longer able to drive, she had been relying upon Son, who lived next door. Son assisted her with travel as well as appointment scheduling. The day following her telephone conversation with her lawyer, Tess told Son that she needed to meet with her lawyer to change her will. Son's busy schedule did not permit him to take Tess to her lawyer's office immediately. ln September 1991, both children had decided that Tess needed assistance in managing and caring for her property. The Court of Chancery granted Son and Daughter's request to be named as coguardians over Tess's property. Shortly thereafter, Tess moved into a nursing home. Finally, in October 1991, Son took Tees to meet with Doolittle and her lawyer to execute a new will. During that meeting, Son questioned Tess about the proposed changes. Tess professed a desire to make the changes, but grew weary and asked to be taken home before anything could be signed. Tess set up another appointment which she never kept. ln February 1992, in their capacity as guardians, Son and Daughter sold Greenacre to pay for her nursing home expenses. On her death in May of 1992, Tess' s assets consisted of cash, including the proceeds from t