Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Inc., as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of riskless inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified.

A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next:

Coefficient of Variation			Adjustment Factor
0		.25		.90
.26		.50		.80
.51		.75		.70
.76		1.00		.60
1.01		1.25		.50

Assume a $200,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year.

Year	Inflow		Coefficient of Variation
1	$	39,000			.16
2		57,300			.24
3		74,500			.53
4		61,400			.82
5		64,700			1.12

Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. a. Fill in the table below: (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your dollar answers to the nearest whole dollar.)

b-1. If the risk-free rate is 4 percent, compute the net present value of the adjusted inflows. (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

b-2. Should this project be accepted?

	Yes
	No