Short Answer question:

John Rawls and Robert Nozick present opposing views on the morality of taxation. Think

about the relevance of these views to the use of tax loopholes and other forms of tax avoidance

that corporations sometimes engage in. How would Rawls and Nozick morally assess these

practices? Explain their views in the course of answering this question. Then critically evaluate

their views. Who is right about tax avoidance, and why (one, the other, or both of them)? Give

reasons to support your answer and consider what someone who disagreed with you would say in

response to them, and respond to these possible responses.