1. Should marginalized groups in our society continue to focus on legal "equality rights" as a way of achieving social justice? Why or why not? In answering this question, your paper might consider points such as (but not limited to): the value and/or limitations of the language of "equality," the value and/or limitations of using "the law" to achieve social justice, if there are alternatives to "equality rights," or even if this varies from one marginalized group to another.

Have 3 supporting details along with explinations

you can uses the following resourses for reference:

Elizabeth Comack, "Theoretical Approaches" (2006)

Diana Majury, "Women's (In)Equality before and after the Charter" (2002)

- British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU (1999)