shouting fire case i have to diagram the arguement which is below

The key propositions in Holmes's argument are as follows:

(1)Shouting "Fire!" in a theater creates a "clear and present danger."

(2)Creating a "clear and present danger" is not protected by the First Amendment.

(3)Shouting "Fire!" in a theater is not protected by the First Amendment.

(4)Schenck's distributing the leaflet to draftees is similar to shouting "Fire!" in a theater.

(5)Schenck's distributing the leaflet to draftees is not protected by the First Amendment.