Show all workings please??? [4/2, 14:39] FESTUS: You are the financial manager of a midsize nonprofit that has just received an endowment of a substantial amount from a longtime supporter. The board members are excited because years of effort have gone into seeking this endowment, and they are expecting that the endowment will mean increased financial stability for the nonprofit in the future. The board members have been distressed by money shortages in recent years caused by donor fatigue and the economic downturn. They do not, however, know how an endowment should be managed. A couple of members have knowledge of accounting and auditing, but no one on the board is an investment expert, and the nonprofit has no experience in endowment investment, given that this is the first endowment the nonprofit has received. You, as the financial manager of the nonprofit, have been asked to take on the responsibility of establishing and managing the endowment (a situation not uncommon in small and midsize nonprofits). You are very happy with the infusion of capital as an endowment, but you take on the role of managing the endowment with some trepidation, knowing how unprepared the nonprofit is for this new financial management task. You want to perform well with the endowment for the mission of the nonprofit, but you do not want to take the blame if the endowment does not achieve excellence, despite your best efforts, because of uncontrollable events such as swings in the market and economic fluctuations. What should you take into consideration and what steps should you undertake if you intend to take on responsibility for the endowment in addition to your other duties?

Complete The Financial Manager Takes Steps to Manage a New Endowment Case Study in a Word document.

[4/2, 14:39] Festuh: Flag

REVISED CORPORATION LAW

1.) Corporation which is public in character but private in purpose:

A.) Corporation

B.) De facto corporation

C.) Non-stock corporation

D.) GOCC

E.) Close corporation

2.) Shares which have been lawfully issued by the corporation and fully paid for and later reacquired it either by purchase, redemption, donation, forfeiture or other lawful means:

A.) Treasury shares

B.) Redeemable shares

C.) Delinquent shares

D.) Stock options

3.) The following are causes for suspension or revocation of certificate of registration of a corporation, EXCEPT:

A.) fraud in procuring certificate of registration

B.) continuous inoperation for 2 years

C.) serious misrepresentation to the damage of the general public

D.) defiance of any lawful order of the SEC

4.) Which among the following is not a valid issue value of a no par value share?

A.) Php 0.50

B.) Php 5.00

C.) Php 50.00

D.) Php 500.00

5.) A corporation has a juridical personality separate and distinct from that of its stockholders or members:

A.) Doctrine of Corporate Entity

B.) Doctrine of Equality of Shares

C.) Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

D.)Trust Fund Doctrine

E.) Dummy Doctrine

6.) This doctrine allows the State to disregard the separate juridical personality of the corporation where the entity is formed or used for non-legitimate purposes.

A.) Doctrine of Corporate Entity

B.) Doctrine of Equality of Shares

C.) Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

D.) Trust Fund Doctrine

E.) Dummy Doctrine

7.) The capital of the corporation must not be dissipated for the purpose of payment of corporate obligations and liabilities.

A.) Doctrine of Corporate Entity

B.) Doctrine of Equality of Shares

C.) Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

D.) Trust Fund Doctrine

E.) Dummy Doctrine

8.) Where the Articles of Incorporation do not provide for any distinction of the shares of stock, all shares issued by the corporation are presumed to be equal and enjoy the same rights and privileges and are also subject to the same liabilities.

A.) Doctrine of Corporate Entity

B.) Doctrine of Equality of Shares

C.) Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

D.) Trust Fund Doctrine

E.) Dummy Doctrine

9.) Where the corporation is controlled by aliens, this is in violation of the law as where it was organized under Philippine laws

A.) Doctrine of Corporate Entity

B.) Doctrine of Equality of Shares

C.) Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

D.) Trust Fund Doctrine

E.) Dummy Doctrine

10.) The following are qualifications of incorporators except:

A.) Natural or artificial persons

B.) Must own at least one share of stock, if stock corporation

C.) Must be of legal age, if natural person

D.) Majority must be citizens of the Philippines

E.) None of the above

11.) Persons who, acting alone or with others, take initiative in founding and organizing the business or enterprise of the issuer and receive consideration therefor

A.) Incorporators

B.) Stock/Shareholders

C.) Corporators

D.) Promoters

E.) Members

12.) Those mentioned in the article of Incorporation as originally forming and composing the corporation

A.) Incorporators

B.) Stock/Shareholders

C.) Corporators

D.) Promoters

E.) Members

13.) Comprise the corporation whether as stockholders or members:

A.) Incorporators

B.) Stock/Shareholders

C.) Corporators

D.) Promoters

E.) Members

14.) Owners of shares in a corporation which has a capital stock:

A.) Incorporators

B.) Stock/Shareholders

C.) Corporators

D.) Promoters

E.) Members

15.Corporators of a corporation which has no capital stock:

A.) Incorporators

B.) Stock/Shareholders

C.) Corporators

D.) Promoters

E.) Members

Question 9: Jimmy is pursuing his degree in a private institution. When he was in his third trimester, the school announced that it will be implementing a new regulation in that all students must wear a uniform that the school will be introducing. Jimmy does not think that this is correct, given that his contract with the school makes no mention of uniforms. Which of the following rules suggests that once a contract has been reduced in writing, one party cannot unilaterally change it terms? (2 marks) A. The Parol Evidence Rule. B. The Rule in Pinnel's Case. C. The Golden Rule. D. The Vitiating Factor Rule.W WordCounter - Count Ward : G henn ofhitions - Googles : |0 Assignment db Paper C) Chopp The Lom of Fenkho X creader.chegg conW/bockw/978156783879Vcf /3/241/4/21402/3405:0 The pistons aproc the techalgod employed by defendant was proper, The sole basis for spending the export testimony would support a finding of sprite negligence is that the berve was injured during nitraction, Where an if orp may over dople the car. s finding of negligent onrol be pinlasted only on the fact it dil sits. Phin ill also maimains there is evidence of repligence from the fact this is beast of injury to a partof the bady not involved in the brcomment. However, that is not in. The surgical procedure did include foraction of the sissend column. It was very much in the surgical field. Third overt did are er in dingding a verdict for defendant on the issue of spotify mepigend. IL. Hes is loquite. Pontiff also alleges the appliability of the doctrine of res ipsi kopisir. Our mail recent adelmel of the doctrine appear in [a 1973eve]: Linder the destring of res ipso inquiter, where (10) injury or damage is cured by an instrumentality under the reclusive control of defendant and (2) the occurrence is rach in is to ordinary course of things would not happen if reasonable care had been med, the happening of the injury pormia, but does not compel, in inference deferalant was negligent. A The coaltest in this case consens presence of the second foundation fan [ from the quoted paragnight. Belowfart argues the wound fondation fact for pes ipss kqubar is shunt because i does not Sic in the common growledge of bymen to may injury to be larynged fever does not opour if du care is cursived in antomar appris thcervical fusion surgery. We must initially decide what his previously been an open question in this jurisdiction may the common expatend in establish the soold boundation fact for its por loqolfor be shown by expert testimony? In the qual cast the basis of pad experience from which this conclusion may be drewn is common to the community, and ba matter of general know badge, which he court neonizes on much the some bash as well likes judicial notice of But which everyone knows. It may, however, be supplied by the evidence of the parties; find expert testimony that much in event mally does not occur without negligence may send a sollicien. heis for the internet In thi cos, how it, even oumakering the expert testimony. the record at best only suppens an inference | that plaintiff suffered an extremely sure injury in anterior approach corsied fusion surgery which They ofour even when due care in exercised Kirity of the commence is not a sufficical predicte for application of new ipsi loqutor.... There is in his in the prestill case, in expert testimony or otherwise, for airing plaintill's injury is more White the result of regligence then you guy for which the defendant is roof meyersible We do not belief there was ary basis in this one for submission of reps boquot Trial can doif not er in Raining in summit it. IV. Billkey or trespass Plaintiff onlends there was also bulletcil evidence to submit the are to the jury on the theory of ballery or trespass. In effect, she illeges the comened to minion of two serieless timeusal of mahone protraded dark thinking that would by a separate opention skitional vertebrae had to be fined. Boy sens for fact four worthen wort lined combined with defendant's assurances and follows to won her of specific Defendant teaified plaintiff win fully advised is in the nature of her problem and the scope of corrective surgery. He acknowledges he did not advice her of the band of vocal chord fairy paralysis. He believed the posibility of wich onmince was puligible and cerweighed by the danger of man apprehension if waming of the risk was chan Aa 40 OA project has the following estimated data: Price = $52 per unit; variable costs = $34 per unit; xed costs = $23,500; required return =12 percent; initial investment = $30,000; life = three years. a. Ignoring the effect of taxes. what is the accounting break-even quantity? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) b. What is the cash break-even quantity? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places. e.g., 32.16.) c. What is the financial breakeven quantity? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) d. What is the degree of operating leverage at the nancial break-even level of output? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 3 decimal places, e.g., 32.161.) a Accounting break-even quantity _ a Cash break-even quantity _ a Financial breakeven quantity _ _ "The codification of directors' duties under the Companies Act 2006 is not an improvement from the common law position. It does little to clarify the nature and scope of the duties owed by directors." Required Discuss this statement with reference to the prior case law on directors' duties the common law rules and the provisions within the Companies Act 2006