Similar to the plaintiff in Rossetti, Plaintiff, here, presumably purchased a ticket to enter Six Flags. It is beyond dispute that the ticket itself did not cause any harm to Plaintiff. Rather, the admission ticket simply memorialized, in writing, Plaintiffs right to enter the amusement park and the right to ride on the roller coasters and partake in other activities; those rights are what Plaintiff purchased. However, this type of transaction does not fall within the definition of goods under [UCC] 2-105(1), because in order to be a transaction in goods, the subject matter of the transactionthe putative goodmust be tangible and movable. The subject matter of the transaction alleged here, i.e., riding on a roller coaster, does not meet this criterion.