Sloane, owner of SpiritAway Spa and Salon, arrived at her desk at $10$:$30$ a$.$m$.$ SpiritAway Spa was a thriving business in a growing industry. Because of her business's reputation, she employed $15$ hair stylists and aestheticians, and SpiritAway was clearly contributing to the local economy.

Sloane had just received her financial analysis from her accountant. By providing a quiet, highend haven and top$-$notch customer service, SpiritAway had seen a $20$ percent increase in sales from the previous year.

Sloane's attention was drawn to a dreadful noise outside her tranquil establishment. Barking reverberated throughout the spa, even though the windows were shut and the ventilation system was on$.$ Sloane had never heard dogs barking before anywhere near her building.

Several of her staff entered her office to complain that the dogs had been barking since early morning. They could see the three junkyard type dogs in a fenced$-$in area next door to the spa.

Sloane contacted the owner of the building who explained that his new tenant, owner of a recording studio, kept the dogs for added security in his newly renovated building with noise$-$cancelling walls.

Sloane voiced her complaint that the dogs' barking continuously through the work day was driving her clients away. The owner of the builaing said he didn't have to comply with Sloane's request as there were no municipal bylaws in that area of town regarding noise.

What is the tort in this case? What would you advise Sloane to do$?([$ LO $3\mathrm{.}4)$

Case $3$