Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

So, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices get critiqued for interpreting and creating what is not written in the Constitution. Let's think about this in another

So, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices get critiqued for "interpreting" and "creating" what is not written in the Constitution. Let's think about this in another context.

For example, the 14th Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The U.S. Supreme Court interpreted that to mean "separate is not equal" in Brown v Board of Education. So, if the Supreme Court is going to stick to the text and not interpret, then how did education get desegregated? Where does the Constitution say anything regarding the separation of students based on race? How does the right to an education mean "equal PROTECTION of the laws"? Education = Protection?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Contemporary Family Law

Authors: Douglas Abrams, Naomi Cahn, Catherine Ross, Linda McClain

5th Edition

1640205918, 978-1640205918

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

2. In what way can we say that method affects the result we get?

Answered: 1 week ago