Social justice has a varied history and a variety of implications. If one of the major tenets of journalism is to minimize harm, how do cases like Castile (if at all) go against this important principle? What major ethical principle does the case violate, if any? Does the case support a major ethical principle? Lastly, what is your opinion of the trend(s) presented based on your knowledge of ethics and morality? Feel free toSocial justice has a varied history and a variety of implications. If one of the major tenets of journalism is to minimize harm, how do cases like Castile (if at all) go against this important principle? What major ethical principle does the case violate, if any? Does the case support a major ethical principle? Lastly, what is your opinion of the trend(s) presented based on your knowledge of ethics and morality? Feel free to use other similar cases to support your ideas and thoughts. use other similar cases to support your ideas and thoughts