Some men's programs have been eliminated or reduced to satisfy compliance (McEldowney, 2009). This raises a question as to whether alternatives approaches can be utilized to reduce the possibility of reduction of male programs. One example proposes changes in the numbers and scholarships in a school's football program, which is almost exclusively male and quite large in many institutions. Because women generally do not have football teams and men's teams contain high numbers of players (with high numbers of scholarships in some cases), this creates difficulties for other men's programs. Men's wrestling or swimming lacks the constituency and alumni interest that football has, so diminution or elimination of football, especially in an institution with a "football tradition," is less likely. Do you think that men's football numbers should be excluded from the formula? Or included in a less than one-to-one manner (such as one male football player is one-half for calculation purposes