Some peers in the discussion forum believe the root problem was Mr. Kelly's lack of communication, which led to a lack of trust. If he had conveyed his vision effectively and chosen a collaborative leadership style, his plan might have been more successful. He should have respected and considered his staff's needs rather than rushing the implementation with minimal training. Trust is crucial and once damaged, it is difficult to repair. Being open to others' perspectives is seen as a key trait of an effective leader, as it shows a humanistic approach and willingness to connect. Trusting ourselves and others is essential for leading when it is time to lead, but also for listening when it is time to listen. Without balance, trust cannot be established. Mr. Kelly struggled to effectively reach his staff due to these issues. The individual gained new perspectives on their theory about the lack of vision in case study 2 by considering their peers' comments. They observed that trust was a significant concern among their peers, and by integrating their thoughts with those of their peers, they were able to reach a consensus on the root factor of the issue. The individual acknowledges that addressing the concerns of others and identifying the root problem in the case study was straightforward once they considered different perspectives. They are confident in their recommended solution, emphasizing that only through meaningful, valid, and reliable evaluation can strengths, weaknesses, conflicting efforts, and wasteful actions be identified (Martin et al, 2017). This allows leaders to take appropriate actions. They note that Mr. Kelly must respect the time of others and remember that leadership is a team effort. Without proper leadership, communication, respect, trust, and a clear vision, any progress or vision would stall. These elements are crucial for a successful movement