Sony is deciding on whether it should invest in a new. PlayStation gaming system. There is a 50% chance that the NPV of the new gaming system will be $1.5 billion and a 50% chance of it being $1 billion. Alternatively, it could wait a year to start the investment so as to gather more information about the viability of this product. But, it can't wait more than a year to start this investment because it will otherwise lose too much ground to its competitors, Microsoft and Nintendo, which have both already decided to begin producing new gaming systems. I.e., by delaying for more than one year, Sony's expected cash flows, should it eventually do the investment, will be lower than what they would be if it were to instead make the investment now. Using your understanding of real options, which of the following statements are correct? (There might be more than one correct statement.) Sony would be more likely to delay if I had instead stated that that the possible losses of the bad scenario were $1.25 billion instead of $1 billion. If the expected loses that occur by delaying and giving its competitors a head start were to increase, Sony will be more likely to invest now. The ability to delay makes it more likely Sony ultimately invests. If Sony decides that delaying is not an option it can consider, it will invest now despite the uncertain prospects of the investment. The option to delay in this scenario is valuable