Question
Sourcing Snapshot Contract Rights in a Declining Market Sourcing Snapshot Contract Rights in a Declining Market The decrease in market price of an item was
Sourcing Snapshot Contract Rights in a Declining Market
Sourcing Snapshot Contract Rights in a Declining Market The decrease in market price of an item was the cause of a dispute involving an electronic contract manufacturer (ECM) that supplied the subassemblies to a first-tier military contractor. The ECM purchased the components from a distributor of electronic components for a contract it had received on a major satellite project.
After receiving the subcontract on the satellite project, the ECM sent out bids on a number of components. The distributor was awarded a contract to supply integrated circuits (ICs) and other items on an "as needed" basis. In essence, the ECM agreed to buy all of the ICs needed during the contract period from the distributor.
After nine months, the distributor noticed that the quantities of ICs had dropped dramatically. An email was sent to the supply manager indicating that hardly any ICs had been purchased during the previous six weeks. The supply manager's email reply was that "a competitor is supplying us ICs to the same specification at less than half of the price you charged us. If you can meet the price, fine. Otherwise we no longer need ICs from your firm." In her reply, the distributor agreed that a new technology and lower demand had triggered lower market prices. However, the ECM had agreed to purchase all the ICs at a higher price earlier in the year. Subsequent meetings failed to produce a satisfactory agreement, and the parties agreed to binding arbitration.
In its arguments to the arbitrator, the ECM contended that the contract merely represented its agreement to purchase as few or as many ICs as it desired and that the distributor was obligated to supply the ICs as needed. Because the ECM was well stocked with ICs from the distributor's competitor, it did not require additional ICs. The distributor argued that the ECM was committed to buying all ICs from it at the agreed-upon price. Any purchases from an outside source violated the spirit and terms of the contract.
1. What lessons are learned from the example of contracting presented in this reading? 2. Are there any reasons not to follow the contract agreed upon with a supplier or customer?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started