Stan hires Margot, a carpenter, to build a sign for the outside entrance of his store Marzot brings her own saw, drill, and other tools. Stan does not know anything about. carpentry work and did not give Margot any direction as to how to carry out the tank While Margot is attaching the sign, a drill slips from her hand, falls, and injures a pedestrian passing by on the sidewalk. The injured person sues Stan and argues that he is vicariously liable for Margot's negligence because she is his employee. The court will likely conclude that: Stan is not liable because he did not exercise sufficient control over Margot for her to be an employee; she is an independent contractor. Stan is not liable because an employer is never liable for torts committed by his employees. Stan is liable because an employer is always liable for torts committed by employees and independent contractors. Stan is liable because the agency was partially disclosed. Question 9(2.5 points) To be found liable for the intentional tort of assault, a person must cause injury to a victim that is the result of direct physical contact. True False