standard. Choose... Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young This case challenged whether it is Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company appropriate to expose Rylands v. Fletcher professionals and other experts to Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council considerably greater liability and Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. used the Reasonable R. v. Spratt Foreseeability/Reasonable Reliance More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. Test to reduce the scope of a AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. representor's potentially infinite Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. liability Yin v. Liu Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. Hadley v. Baxendale Haig v. Bamford This case created a two-stage test Donoghue v. Stevenson for determining the existence of a duty of care. Choose