Stanley Mancero is 18 years old and is currently on trial for arson. He testified in his own defense at trial, and the prosecution attempted to impeach him with evidence that he had been convicted of burglary two years ago. Mancero's attorney objected to admission of the evidence, and noted that there was a pending appeal from the prior conviction. The judge should:

Group of answer choices

A. Overrule the objection if the evidence would be admissible against an adult and the court finds that admission is necessary for a fair determination of the issue of guilt or innocence.

B. Overrule the objection, since burglary is not a crime of falsity.

C. Sustain the objection because an appeal of the conviction is still pending.

D. Sustain the objection, because evidence that the accused committed a crime as a juvenile is never admissible.