Stark was the president of a retail food chain with 36,000 employees, 874 stores, and 16 warehouses. In 1970, federal inspectors advised officers of the corporation that unsanitary conditions were found in a warehouse. Twice in 1971, further unsanitary conditions were reported. In March of 1972, continued evidence of rodent activity and "rodent-contaminated lots of food items" was found. Despite the repeated warnings by the federal inspectors, the violations were not corrected. When the food company and Stark were charged with violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the corporation pleaded guilty and Stark pleaded not guilty before a jury. Can Stark be found criminally responsible for the actions of his employees? What theory would the prosecution use?