1. State the main rule of law being applied. If an element of the rule is at the center of the controversy, identify that element.
2. Which kind of issue exists -
   1. What is the definition?
   2. Do the facts fit THE CASE? Or
   3. Is there consistency
   4. Give a shorthand statement of the issue and holding for the above cases
   5. For the holding in the above opinions, identify the court's reasoning

43 A.D.2d 716 (1973) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Howard Sohn, Appellant December 10, 1973 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, and indictment dismissed. In our view the evidence failed to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The testimony as to how the incident began was extremely equivocal and it cannot be concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was the aggressor. A finding that appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact that they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival. This, coupled with the fact that the complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident, indicates that the People failed to meet their burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt