Strategic Supply Chain Relationships and the Innovative approaches that Organizations need to employ for their success in 2023, especially in the rapid global changes require a much smarter and swifter approach to operational change in current times. Critically evaluate a global company Toyota and their supply network in terms of Strategic Supply Chain Relationships and Innovative practices. Consideration to the Value Creation issues should be made here. Please selectthree themes from innovation, strategy and relationships as a backdrop while developing your answer. Use a real-world case study to support your considerations. The Critical Evaluation of Strategic Supply Chain Relationships and Innovation involves argumentative and analytical discussion throughout the report with regard to the individual and interface role of elements in global supply network. Therefore, you MUST NOT discuss elements identified in isolation. You will submit a report by developing a critical evaluation (an argument) in relation to strategic supply chain relationships and innovation from a network perspective in Toyota global organisation by using different underpinning theories, strategies and practices that have been taught during the semester and some other strategies and theories. Assessment Brief - 

 The critical evaluation will also need to be integrated with the selected real world case study in relation to analyse the theoretical and practical approach of the argument. It must be evident that you have had a balanced approach between Strategic Supply Chain Relationships and Innovation considering value creation in supply networks through a critically analysed and argumentative analysis towards one goal, which is the "competitive advantage". Marking grid for the Assignment (based on 100%): - Introduction (purpose of this assignment, rationale behind selecting the specific global organisation in relation to the focus of this report, and the brief structure of the rest of the work)  10%

 - Main Body (the critical and argumentative analysis)  - 70% includes: 

- Appropriate focus on elements of question and its objective - 10%

 - Appropriate extensive theoretical and literature contribution - 30%

 - Appropriate practical contribution and link to the case study - 10% 

- Critical evaluation with in-depth analytical review - 20% 

- Concluding remarks (summary of understanding, recommendations, future works, practical implications)  - 10%