Students always want to know what the best way to study is. Researchers believe that the 3R method (read, recite, review) is the best. We decide to test out the 3R method with 2 other very popular study strategies (re-reading and note-taking) to see if there is a difference in any strategy. 15 students from HIST 103 are selected to use different study strategies to prepare for their midterm exam. Some participants use the 3R method, some use the re-reading method, and the rest use the note-taking method. The scores below represent the number of questions that each participant got wrong on the midterm exam. Use the data below to determine if there is a difference in wrong answers based on the type of study strategy used. Test at = .05. Re-reading Note-taking 3R Method 8 4 2 8 5 2 6 5 5 7 7 4 8 5 5 Test of homogeneity of variance, leven statistic=1.64, df1=2, df2=12, p value=.235, Group 1 M=7.40, SD=.89, SE=.40, Group 2 M=5.20, SD=1.10, SE=.49, Group 3 M=3.60, SD=1.52, SE=.68, Anova scores between groups sum of squares =36.40, df=2, mean square =18.20, F=12.70, p value=.001, within groups sum of squares=17.20, df=12, mean square =1.43, total sum of square=53.60, df=14, Interpret the significance of the test statistic (using p value and real interpretation with IV and DV descriptors). g. Is a post hoc test needed for this analysis? If needed, interpret the results with p values as support