summarize: Examinees should persuasively argue that summary judgment should be granted and that the defendant should not be liable in negligence because 1) the circumstances of the plaintiff's injury in the Haunted House were not caused by a breach of the defendant's duty, given the nature of the attraction, the fact that it was Halloween, and the adequate maintenance of the attraction and supervision and instruction of its personnel; 2) the plaintiff was aware of the condition of the path in the mock graveyard, and no reasonably prudent person would have incurred injury in such circumstances; and 3) given the general expectation of being accosted by role-playing persons on Halloween, the defendant did not breach its duty to the plaintiff and so is not liable for her injury outside the Haunted House attraction