Suppose a lawyer makes the following argument. The defendant should not be sentenced to death for the double homicide he committed. In the past, the courts have held that children cannot be executed. And although the defendant is $52,$ under the influence of the medication he was taking at the time, he was no more capable of rational judgment than a small child. Which of the following facts would most strengthen the argument?

Group of answer choices

The past rulings that children cannot be executed cited lack of rational judgment as the reason.

The defendant is a father of small children.

The past rulings that children cannot be executed were issues more than two decades ago.

The defendant was once a child himself.

The past rulings that children cannot be executed were all in cases involving homicide.