Suppose you are an attorney representing a woman who broke her leg after slipping on a wet floor at a store. The woman is suing the store for $100,000 in damages.Knowing only what you know aboutperceptual contrast, what could you do during the trial to make the jury see $100,000 as a reasonable, even small award. That is, how could you useperceptual contrast(orThe Contrast Principle) to obtain a higher reward amount for your client? Explain your approach and reasoning in detail. Why do you think your approach would be effective?