Question
Suppose you wish to handle a workload consisting of a large number of small transactions by using shared-nothing parallelism. Is intraquery parallelism required in such
Suppose you wish to handle a workload consisting of a large number of small transactions by using shared-nothing parallelism. Is intraquery parallelism required in such a situation? If not, why, and what form of parallelism is appropriate? What form of skew would be of significance with such a workload? Suppose most transactions accessed one account record, which includes an account type attribute, and an associated account type master record, which provides information about the account type. How would you partition and/or replicate data to speed up transactions? You may assume that the account type master relation is rarely updated. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started