Tania was watching television one evening and came across an advertisement by Comp Whiz Pty Ltd which had the following wording: Financial year end sale. Up to 70% off on all computer equipment and other electronics in our store. Hurry now. This promotion lasts for selected brands only. While stocks last. Terms and conditions apply. If customers spend at least $1000 on mobile and electronic goods, they are entitled to get 50% off on future purchases over the next year. Tania turns up at the store the next day and walks around browsing the items for sale. Tania took a liking for an IPhone Geni 3+ which had a price tag of $700 and proceeded to the counter to make her purchase. When the item was scanned at the registry, she was informed that the price tag of the item was in fact inaccurate and the correct price according to their system was $800. Tania believes she is entitled to purchase the IPhone Geni 3+ at the displayed price of $700. Tania further enquired whether she would be entitled to get 50% off on future purchases if she decided to spend at least $1000 on mobile and electronic goods at the store. The store assistant replied, Sorry, the promotion was not meant to be taken seriously. It is just advertising dear!

Advise Tania on the following questions: It is important that you outline the issue, relevant law (legal principles), application and conclusion (IRAC) for the questions.

(b)Was there a contract to sell Tania: i) the IPhone Geni 3+ at the displayed price of $700 and ii) to provide the discount of 50% on future purchases.