Task 2: Chair the meeting articipants meeting evaluation P e e .. v e /4 Some Agenda items could have been dealt with via other means (e.g. did not really require team discussion; information could have |V been provided via other staff communication system) 4. Relevant information was provided prior to the meeting (Rate N/A if not applicable) 5. The purpose of the meeting was made clear to me 6. All participants were given the opportunity to provide input 7. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing one or two people to dominate the discussion 8. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing participant 1o 'go off topic' 9. The chairperson controlled the meeting by moving the discussion along 10. The chairperson controlled the meeting by reminding participants of the meeting timeframe 11. The chairperson concluded the meeting by summarising key points of discussion and any decisions made 12. The chairperson allocated follow-up tasks to some participants 13. A system was used to record the key points of discussion (e.g. minute taker) 14. The meeting was concluded on time Constructive feedback (what could have been done better/how?) gpfS maetfn(:j werd, wel | Task 2: Chair the meeting Participants meeting evaluation Rate each meeting element: Yes, No, N/A (not applicable) Element Yes No N/A 1. The meeting began on time 2. There was a well-defined agenda 3. Some Agenda items could have been dealt with via other means (e.g. did not really require team discussion; information could have been provided via other staff communication system) 4. Relevant information was provided prior to the meeting (Rate N/A if not applicable) 5. The purpose of the meeting was made clear to me 6. All participants were given the opportunity to provide input 7. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing one or two people to dominate the discussion 8 . The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing participant to 'go off topic' 9. The chairperson controlled the meeting by moving the discussion along 10. The chairperson controlled the meeting by reminding participants of the meeting timeframe 11. The chairperson concluded the meeting by summarising key points of discussion and any decisions made 12. The chairperson allocated follow-up tasks to some participants 13. A system was used to record the key points of discussion (e.g. minute taker) 14. The meeting was concluded on time Constructive feedback (what could have been done better/how?) meeting was well conducted and explained very clearly so all New trainees could understandTask 2: Chair the meeting Participants meeting evaluation Rate each meeting element: Yes, No, N/A (not applicable) | D (7] Element 1. The meeting began on time B s il 2. There was a well-defined agenda 3. Some Agenda items could have been dealt with via other means (e.g. did not really require team discussion; information could have been provided via other staff communication system) 4. Relevant information was provided prior to the meeting (Rate N/A if not applicable) 5. The purpose of the meeting was made clear to me 6. All participants were given the opportunity to provide input 7. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing one or two people to dominate the discussion 8. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing participant to 'go off topic' 9. The chairperson controlled the meeting by moving the discussion along 10. The chairperson controlled the meeting by reminding participants of the meeting timeframe 11. The chairperson concluded the meeting by summarising key points of discussion and any decisions made 12. The chairperson allocated follow-up tasks to some participants 13. A system was used to record the key points of discussion (e.g. minute taker) BRI S /' X/ 4. Relevant information was provided prior to the meeting (Rate N/A if not applicable) 5. The purpose of the meeting was made clear to me 6. All participants were given the opportunity to provide input 7. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing one or two people to dominate the discussion 8. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing participant to 'go off topic' Eisa-l 9. The chairperson controlled the meeting by moving the discussion along 10. The chairperson controlled the meeting by reminding participants of the meeting timeframe 11. The chairperson concluded the meeting by summarising key points of discussion and any decisions made N PRI B 13. A system was used to record the key points of discussion (e.g. minute taker) Constructive feedback (what could have been done better/how?) Avozing S d v vy o0 Aty Ot o4 QY. Task 2: Chair the meeting Participants meeting evaluation Rate each meeting element: Yes, No, N/A (not applicable) Element 1. The meeting began on time 2. There was a well-defined agenda 3. Some Agenda items could have been dealt with via other means (e.g. did not really require team discussion; information could have been provided via other staff communication system) 4. Relevant information was provided prior to the meeting (Rate N/A if not applicable) 5. The purpose of the meeting was made clear to me R S s B [ ] 6. All participants were given the opportunity to provide input 7. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing one or two people to dominate the discussion 8. The chairperson controlled the meeting by not allowing participant to 'go off topic' 9. The chairperson controlled the meeting by moving the discussion along 10. The chairperson controlled the meeting by reminding participants of the meeting timeframe 11. The chairperson concluded the meeting by summarising key points of discussion and any decisions made 12. The chairperson allocated follow-up tasks to some participants 13. A system was used to record the key points of discussion (e.g. minute taker) 14. The meeting was concluded on time Constructive feedback (what could have been done better/how?) w ent well |