TASK 2 Search FIVE (5) articles from any books, journals, reports or any relevant documents on subject of procurement then compare and contrast the effectiveness of procurement activities that conform to the procedures, processes and the principles of public procurement as reflect to 1PP. Each group must choose any one from the list of topics: 1. Policies and procedures in Public Procurement 2. Procedures pf Procurement: Centralised and Decentralised 3. Government Procurement Principles 4. Categories of Government Procurement 5. Methods of Public Procurement: Direct Purchase 6. Methods of Public Procurement: Quotation 7. Methods of Public Procurement: Tender 8. Methods of Public Procurement: Emergency Purchase 9. Methods of Public Procurement: Foreign/ International Purchase 10. Federal Procurement Board 11. Government Assets Management 12. Government Assets Disposal 13. Issues in Government Procurement The discussion should include problem identification, analysis, application, synthesis and evaluation and finally recommend for any improvement. At the end, students must report the findings from the analysis done. REQUIREMENT FOR PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS REPORT (20%) o Plain white paper (A4) o The number of pages depends on the budget planning (might exceed 20 pages but do not more than 50 pages) o Text page should be shown at the bottom center. o 1.5 spaced o Font (12 for Times New Roman/ 11 for Arial) o All titles are to be capitalized and bold. o Format for numberings, citations and references (APA style) are to be followed. o The assignment should include front page, table of content, preface, contents, conclusion, references and appendices (optional) CO3: Organise relevant information on the effectiveness of procurement activities that conform to the requirement of 1PP Rubrics for Written Report (20%) Subattribute Marks Very Weak 0-2.0 Weak 2.1-4.0 Fair 4.1-6.0 Good 6.1-8.0 Very Good 8.1-10.0 Independently able Problem Identification Able to partially explain a problem to Not able to explain a problem, even with assistance. Able to explain a problem with minimum assistance. with minimum assistance. explain a problem clearly without assistance. Able to provide explanation of problem very clearly and accurately. Analysis Not able to organise and analyse gathered information r Finds difficulty in organizing and analysing gathered information or data and finds difficulty Able to organise and analyse gathered information or data but does not clearly Able to organize and analyse gathered information or data, clearly describe the some factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the possible root of the problem. Able to organize and analyse gathered information or data, clearly describe the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the root of the problem.. in data and fails to define the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the root explaining the factors that neither contribute to the problem/issue nor explains the root of the problem. describe the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or clearly explain the root of the problem. of the problem. Not able to apply any new idea or knowledge to a given problem. Limited ability to apply new idea or knowledge or Able to apply new idea or knowledge to a given problem with assistance from lecturer or student. Able to apply new idea or knowledge to a given problem independently. Able to apply new idea knowledge to a given problem and able able to propose alternative applications Able to gather and Fails togather information for synthesis and evaluation. Has difficulty in gathering. synthesising and evaluating information. Able to gather relevant information, synthesise and evaluate the information and offers simple, unsupported Able to gather and thinks about information, synthesise, able to offer responsible interpretations; provides sufficient evidence to support conclusions. evaluate information, chooses a clear interpretations; and provides sufficient evidence (quality and quantity) to support conclusions. conclusions. Able to make decisions based on comparison and Not able to make decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and solutions even with assistance. Able to make decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and available solutions with some assistance. Able to make good decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and Able to make excellent decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, contrast between information, ideas and available solutions.. available identify problems and solutions.. available solutions.. Application Synthesis and Evaluation Decision- Making Comments: Checked by: Name: Total Overall: /50% Total Continues Assessment: 120% Signature: TASK 2 Search FIVE (5) articles from any books, journals, reports or any relevant documents on subject of procurement then compare and contrast the effectiveness of procurement activities that conform to the procedures, processes and the principles of public procurement as reflect to 1PP. Each group must choose any one from the list of topics: 1. Policies and procedures in Public Procurement 2. Procedures pf Procurement: Centralised and Decentralised 3. Government Procurement Principles 4. Categories of Government Procurement 5. Methods of Public Procurement: Direct Purchase 6. Methods of Public Procurement: Quotation 7. Methods of Public Procurement: Tender 8. Methods of Public Procurement: Emergency Purchase 9. Methods of Public Procurement: Foreign/ International Purchase 10. Federal Procurement Board 11. Government Assets Management 12. Government Assets Disposal 13. Issues in Government Procurement The discussion should include problem identification, analysis, application, synthesis and evaluation and finally recommend for any improvement. At the end, students must report the findings from the analysis done. REQUIREMENT FOR PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS REPORT (20%) o Plain white paper (A4) o The number of pages depends on the budget planning (might exceed 20 pages but do not more than 50 pages) o Text page should be shown at the bottom center. o 1.5 spaced o Font (12 for Times New Roman/ 11 for Arial) o All titles are to be capitalized and bold. o Format for numberings, citations and references (APA style) are to be followed. o The assignment should include front page, table of content, preface, contents, conclusion, references and appendices (optional) CO3: Organise relevant information on the effectiveness of procurement activities that conform to the requirement of 1PP Rubrics for Written Report (20%) Subattribute Marks Very Weak 0-2.0 Weak 2.1-4.0 Fair 4.1-6.0 Good 6.1-8.0 Very Good 8.1-10.0 Independently able Problem Identification Able to partially explain a problem to Not able to explain a problem, even with assistance. Able to explain a problem with minimum assistance. with minimum assistance. explain a problem clearly without assistance. Able to provide explanation of problem very clearly and accurately. Analysis Not able to organise and analyse gathered information r Finds difficulty in organizing and analysing gathered information or data and finds difficulty Able to organise and analyse gathered information or data but does not clearly Able to organize and analyse gathered information or data, clearly describe the some factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the possible root of the problem. Able to organize and analyse gathered information or data, clearly describe the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the root of the problem.. in data and fails to define the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or explain the root explaining the factors that neither contribute to the problem/issue nor explains the root of the problem. describe the factors that contribute to the problem/issue or clearly explain the root of the problem. of the problem. Not able to apply any new idea or knowledge to a given problem. Limited ability to apply new idea or knowledge or Able to apply new idea or knowledge to a given problem with assistance from lecturer or student. Able to apply new idea or knowledge to a given problem independently. Able to apply new idea knowledge to a given problem and able able to propose alternative applications Able to gather and Fails togather information for synthesis and evaluation. Has difficulty in gathering. synthesising and evaluating information. Able to gather relevant information, synthesise and evaluate the information and offers simple, unsupported Able to gather and thinks about information, synthesise, able to offer responsible interpretations; provides sufficient evidence to support conclusions. evaluate information, chooses a clear interpretations; and provides sufficient evidence (quality and quantity) to support conclusions. conclusions. Able to make decisions based on comparison and Not able to make decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and solutions even with assistance. Able to make decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and available solutions with some assistance. Able to make good decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, ideas and Able to make excellent decisions based on comparison and contrast between information, contrast between information, ideas and available solutions.. available identify problems and solutions.. available solutions.. Application Synthesis and Evaluation Decision- Making Comments: Checked by: Name: Total Overall: /50% Total Continues Assessment: 120% Signature