Question
TB Patients Healthy Controls Passive Smoking Yes 122 104 No 85 114 Q1. If we did not adjust for sex, how would our results be
TB Patients | Healthy Controls | |
Passive Smoking | ||
Yes | 122 | 104 |
No | 85 | 114 |
Q1. If we did not adjust for sex, how would our results be impacted?
a) The crude (unadjusted) association would overestimate the 'true' (adjusted) association
b) The crude (unadjusted) association would underestimate the 'true' (adjusted) association
c) Since sex does not act as a confounder, leaving sex unadjusted for would have no impact on our results
Please Provide Explanation:
Q2. The authors ran additional logistic regression models to examine the association between passive smoking and TB that adjusted for all of the following covariates: sex (male vs. female), age (continuous), marital status (married vs. other), educational background ( primary school (ref), junior high school, high school), body mass index (<18.5 (ref), 18.5 - 24.9, 25), and alcohol drinking (yes vs. no). Please write out the logistic regression model statement for this fully adjusted model and please write out the label for each variable.
Please Provide Explanation:
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started